BARRACK THE MAGNIFICENT?????

Barrack is the result of affirmative action on steroids with just a touch of "blow". Still the juvenile he always was, and playing any part for kicks.

DEATH OF THE AMERICAN RACE OF PEOPLE.

Obama's tyrannical and totalitarian government is being hailed by all the other totalitarian governments the world over.
These other governments know they are being legitimized and supported by the most powerful government in the world.
They are reveling in the systematic dismantling of the United States Constitution, and the arrogant People that make up this nation.
When the destruction is considered complete, anarchy shall grow out of the overwhelming oppression imposed by these governments and wars shall ensue.
Many warring factions will rejoice in the carnage, mayhem, and insanity taking place, and even profit from the dismal human conditions forced upon peoples by their own governments and warring factions.
Many will rejoice in the monumental leap backwards for the human species, but not I.
My life span shall not permit me to live into this steadfast quest for primitiveness; But, I shall leave behind guides and teachings for my children, to aide in their survival for the recovery to a sophisticated society once again.

THIS UNCONSTITUTIONAL ADMINISTRATION.

"...........generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can't do to you. Says what the federal government can't do to you, but doesn't say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf."
Barrack Obama.

Barrack DOES understand the Constitutional basics; And he pushed his health care through even though he knew it was unconstitutional.
And so did his Congressional cronies.
Expect to see more "legislation" enacted in the Oval Office and approved by the felons in Congress.

DILUTE THE FUTURE!

The way I see it; The only way to offset the debt being mounted on future generations, is to spread it out among more debtors; By this I mean have more kids.
The only difference between the United States and China, for future generations, will be the language. The U.S. will look more like China than China itself.
And things manufactured in America will be regarded as the cheapest on earth.

RATS REVENGE!

Heh!
The rats in Washington are using people for their health care experiments.
Where are the people’s rights activists?

FIRST REDNECK PRESIDENT

Obama:
“Watch me put those eggs back in that chicken!”
Since Clinton was our first black president, could Obama be our first Redneck president?

OBAMA'S PROMISES

Obama making promises sounds exactly like this German leader who told the Jews:
"We're holding a meeting of all Jews in that auditorium over there, in about an hour. Just go make yourselves comfortable until the meeting starts."

BARRACK OBAMA: ALLAH OF AMERICA!

I’m sure President Zero will take any measure to have “In Barrack We Trust” printed on all our currency. With the respect the currency is getting from other nations, what difference would that make?
Part of his legacy is going to be a nation of welfare recipients equalled by no other nation.
Having such an under accomplished, ignorant, gullible, individual as Commander in Chief, enables the covert (?) communists (Rahm, Axelrod, Pelosi, Reid, etc.) to force through their agendas and policies.
Without the support and guidance of these “closet communists”, he would be completely disoriented, and foundering like a loose dinghy in a hurricane.

MY IMAGE OF OBAMA IN THE OVAL OFFICE.

I'm reminded every day by the image of Obama pacing around the Oval Office, when I watch the last turd circle the toilet bowl before going down the drain.

REASON FOR NO OBAMA PAPERWORK DISCOVERED!

It has been discovered that Baracks boogers have been the the reason no one has found any evidence of Barack Obama's paperwork from any of his classes as the paperwork has been either stuck to other pages or folders, or it has been destroyed from jamming the copy machines and fax machines used to try to make or send copies.
His nose picking goes back to his childhood, where he was never told it was unacceptable, and unsanitary.
And, even today, Barack uses boogers as bookmarks. This is most likely the reason he hasn't provided any healthcare paperwork of his own.
It's not "Barack Hussein Obama, MMMMM, MMMMM, MMMMM", any more;
It's now "Barack Hussein Obama, boogety, boogety, boogety, boogety, shoo".

Community Organization 101.

The unemployment in the United States, plays right into the hands of the Democrats. Thereby fulfilling their dependence on more federal government.
The benefit payments barely cover subsistence;
Extending benefits discourages job hunting;
The bad weather and lack of money keep people from going to Washington for massive demonstrations against their illegal legislation maneuvers;
And their media conveniently ignore any resemblance of protest from the citizenry.
If this ain’t communism, it’s still a good attempt to duplicate it.

RECONCILIATION? REALLY?

The Reconciliation Process was enacted to address budgetary legislation.
So, apparently, the Democrat Party, Obama, Pelosi, and Reid, plan on legislation that amends current Federal Healthcare Legislation in order to use "reconciliation" in the fashion it was intended to address budgetary legislation.
Needless to say, these people intend to twist the "reconciliation process" enough to apply to their desired legislation.
Any other application is illegal and unconstitutional. But, as we already know, illegal or unconstitutional doesn't mean crap to these people.
The Republican Party is going to be overwhelmed with indicting and investigating these criminals for years. No wonder the Republican Administrations don't get much meaningful legislation passed during their tenure.

YOU'LL LOVE THIS! SIGNS OF THE TIMES!

- The Daily Caller – Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment - http://dailycaller.com -

Secrets of TV news: Confessions of an anchorman
Posted By Megan Mulligan On January 15, 2010 @ 2:35 am In DC Exclusives, Editor's Picks, Middle Column, Politics, US | 35 Comments

The following was written by a well-known news anchor from a top-10, big city station:

For the last 30 years, I’ve devoted the better part of my life to frightening you, trying my best to make you believe that you are weak, vulnerable, dependent and at risk. I know what’s good for you. You don’t. I’ve tried hard for three decades to defy the laws of nature and return you to infancy, cradled in your mommy’s arm, suckling at her breast, all warm and cozy, not a care in the world. I am the tip of the spear of the liberal nanny state. I am ANCHORMAN!

Actually, I’m mostly serious. For the better part of my adult life, I’ve worked as an anchor and reporter at CBS, NBC and ABC affiliated newsrooms across the country — often complaining about the nanny-state liberalism that infects so much of news coverage. Arguably, local news is a more insidious and destructive force than the widely accepted liberal bias of networks and other national components of mainstream media. After all, study after study has demonstrated that local news is more widely watched — and, more importantly, more trusted than other forms of mainstream media. There is a case to be made that the steady drumbeat of hyped-up threats — SUV’s that roll over, kitchen-counter bacteria, road rage, swine flu, amber alerts and the stations’ willingness to enlist governments and institutions to solve those “perceived” problems, actually drives a lot of bad and unnecessary public policy.

But it’s a formula that has worked as a cash cow for your local TV station. It is no accident that most local TV stations market themselves with nanny-state slogans: “Channel 2: Working for you!” or “ABC 6: On your side!” You might say those slogans are a subtler version of, “NBC 5: Making your boo-boos all better!”

How did it get that way? Let me use one common story in local TV news as an example of the larger problem. Last month local TV newsrooms across the country, mine included, did dozens of stories about breast cancer. Dozens of them. It was after all, breast-cancer awareness month, and we, pardon the pun, milked it for all it was worth. In the words of another writer, our newscasts were all packaged in a “tight pink ribbon.” This was not an accident. Never mind the inconvenient little fact that breast cancer is not the leading killer of women — that would be heart disease. It’s not even the leading cancer killer. That would be lung cancer, followed by colorectal cancer. But why does breast cancer get coverage that is so disproportionate to its toll? Why don’t TV stations do month-long, flood-the-zone stories on, say, colon cancer? Because breast cancer is a disease tailor-made for the hype/fear factory of local TV news. In all the world’s cultures the breast has been a symbol of life and fertility. In American culture, it is a symbol of sex, too. How could your local TV station go wrong flooding the zone over this issue? Especially given the one demographic group your station desperately wants to cater to. More on that later.

It reminds me of the tidal wave of coverage of silicone breast implants controversy late in the last century. As you’ll recall, silicone breast implants (a uniquely American form of cosmetic body modification) were linked to a variety of ills, chief among them, auto-immune disorders. In a months-long media feeding frenzy, breast-implant victims were paraded before congressional hearings and press conferences, caring congressmen and compassionate trial attorneys at their side, dutiful reporters recounting their sincere stories of victimhood. Billions of dollars changed hands, law firms were enriched, legislation was passed and silicone manufacturers went bankrupt. Silicone implants were taken off the market. Thousands of people lost their jobs.

Just one small problem. The link between auto-immune disorders and silicone breast implants was ultimately disproved. That was a story you probably never saw on your local news. It didn’t fit the formula.

Here’s the formula. Highly trained Anchorman (booming authoritative, focus-group-tested voice at the ready) or better yet, Anchorwoman (compassionate voice and pouty face, furrowed brow at the ready), reads the headline, tosses to reporter. Hyperventilating reporter further frightens with victim sound bite, followed by sound bite from plaintiff attorney (”This poor victim needs to be compensated.”). Followed by politician sound bite (”I’m introducing legislation …”) followed by reporter tag, which may or may not include response from big, bad, deep-pocketed corporation. Interestingly, that last component — the response from the corporate evildoers, often becomes, in my experience, a throwaway part of many stories — something along the lines of, “The XYZ company denies any wrongdoing.” Or even, “The XYZ company was unavailable for comment at news time.”

I’ve even noted a pattern among some media-savvy trial attorneys. Often, they’ll fax or e-mail a press release of a pending lawsuit or action to newsrooms on Friday afternoons — enough time for a reporter to get a camera crew, head to the law office, get the sound bite for the evening deadline, but not enough time for the deep-pocketed corporation, with it’s multi-layered media information office, often located in a distant city, to respond before deadline time. So, the story airs, unchallenged, with the charges stewing and brewing over the weekend. The corporation is sucker-punched, feeding frenzy gains steam, politicians take note. Damage is done, forcing corporation to consider out-of-court settlement, sparing them more bad publicity, but most importantly, sparing the plaintiff attorney all of that hard work of trial preparation, but with an easy payoff .

I’ve used the example of breast implants, but the formula works for any perceived wrongdoing. And even if trial lawyers aren’t involved, victim status is — with the promise of fixing the boo-boo — “Working for you.” As one news director I worked for once said, “There are lots of things to be afraid of out there.” Indeed, cancer, household bacteria, child predators, hot weather, cold weather, tap water, electromagnetic fields, vaccinations, Chinese food, Mexican food, racism, fertilizers, homophobia, hate crimes, ad infinitum, ad nauseum.

And, who is most likely to be afraid of these threats? Well, the mainstream media machine, cynically and manipulatively, believes it’s that key demographic group, women ages 18-49. They, according to consultants and marketing executives, control the household remote and make the buying decisions. No. One. Else. Matters.

In an ultimate display of hypocritical sexism, your local liberal newsroom treats women of that coveted demographic group as if they were frightened wards of the nanny state, as if they were children incapable of weighing risk against advantage, detriment against benefit. It plies them with a daily dose of all the things one must be afraid of. And it cynically taps into those traits that evolution has bestowed women with in greater quantity than men — compassion and empathy.

Compassion and empathy were feelings that newsmen and women of a bygone era, kept a very tight rein on — lest they lose objectivity and skepticism. Skepticism in the newsroom nowadays is in short supply. It strangely gets a pass from the perky, beautiful, 20- and 30-somethings who make up the bulk of newsroom staffs. They are too often uncurious. They walk in lockstep with the liberal orthodoxy. They give a pass to questions about global warming, what Hope and Change really mean, the costs that “clean” energy would impose and an infinite number of other issues of the day.

In the story plan meetings, the old school vets with their institutional knowledge are no longer there to block the predictable cliché-ridden ideas and assumptions. Often, a creepy kind of consensus is formed through the filter of political correctness. Naysayers are branded as malcontents. Who could criticize, for example, the dull, obligatory breast-cancer awareness walk idea from the reporter who volunteered to have a mammogram on TV? Or the “Stop the Violence Rally” idea from the African-American reporter who lives in the neighborhood of last week’s murder. Or the “Take The Subway to Work Day” story, proposed by the stations “green” reporter, himself a committed environmentalist or the AIDS day story from the young openly gay reporter?

It is a very narrow row from which these young journalism sprouts have been culled. Today, many large media companies have written policies — NBC/ General Electric and Gannett to name two — whereby station managers and executives cannot be promoted unless they themselves promote minorities and women. And where do managers go to ensure their own advancement, while hiring the perfect rainbow of staffers? The NABJ. NAHJ. NLGJA. NAHJ. These are the minority journalists associations. Black, Hispanic, gay and lesbian, Native American, Asian American. And curiously, among them, objectivity seems to be secondary to their particular form of advocacy and their “progressive” mandates. Each, in furtherance of their own mission is quick to claim victim status if quotas are not met or if their ideals are not expressed through “advocacy” journalism.

Much has been written about the reception, for example, that then-candidate Obama received when speaking at the National Association of Black Journalists convention in Chicago. It was a standing ovation, and a rush to the podium, so the fawning throng could have their picture snapped with the president-to-be. His opponent, John McCain received a smattering of polite applause.

It was no surprise then, more than a year later when President Obama, appearing at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, joked to the thousands of journalists in attendance, “Most of you covered me. All of you voted for me.” The line got a laugh … and then … in an insult to journalism, thousands in the crowd clapped and cheered, in affirmation of the truth. There was no shame for them. Quite the contrary, they reveled in it. The new mainstream media was on display for all to see in one giant, embarrassing ensemble. All of them feminized, sensitized and diversified. But it was also a perfect moment in time — thousands of nanny-state warriors, before their leader, ready to go forth to women ages 18-49 and spread the fear, and propose solutions of the state. What bad public policy may result, we have only begun to see.

Article printed from The Daily Caller – Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment: http://dailycaller.com

URL to article: http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/15/confessions-of-an-anchorman/

THOUGHT FOR THE DAY!

Just think: If the United States is attacked with Nuclear Weapons, and wiped out, Obama and Biden will be protected with the latest and greatest technology so they can survive and recreate the United States in their own image!
And with their own offspring!
The human race is completely doomed.

OUR ALLEGED PRESIDENT.

What's wrong with this picture?
Islamic factions have declared war on the United States more than a decade ago, and continue to this day;
Illegal combatants have attacked, and continue to attack U.S. civilians and military in U.S. military uniforms and civilian clothes, while professing their allegiance to the largest, most overt, and outspoken, terrorist organization and their religion of Islam;
The alleged President of The United States, has declared "We are NOT at war with these factions";
Any combatants captured by the United States are treated as common criminals, and given U.S. Constitutional protections and free legal counsel;
The most prolific intelligence agency in the United States is threatened with prosecution from this alleged President, and his lackeys, for pursuing these illegal terrorist combatants;
This alleged President and his lackeys have decided that the terminology they will use for these attacks, and terrorist actions, will not denote the true nature of the actions, so as not to condemn them;
The U.S. servile media, has decided to take sides in this "war", by promoting this alleged Presidents quoted propaganda;
Absolute NEGLIGENCE abounds starting with this alleged President, and progressing through all his appointed servants;
United States Presidents are required to take an "Oath of Office" that they shall " PROTECT THE UNITED STATES FROM IT'S ENEMIES, BOTH FOREIGN AND ABROAD."
IS THERE ANY DOUBT THAT THIS ALLEGED PRESIDENT HAS VIOLATED HIS OATH OF OFFICE?
IS THERE ANY DOUBT THAT THIS ALLEGED PRESIDENT HAS FACILITATED, AND CONTINUES TO FACILITATE, ILLEGAL, ISLAMIC TERRORIST COMBATANTS?
IS THERE ANY DOUBT THAT THIS ALLEGED PRESIDENT INTENDS TO THWART THE PROSECUTION OF THESE TERRORIST COMBATANTS BY SUBVERTING THE ESTABLISHED PROCESS TO ISOLATE, INTERROGATE, AND CONFINE THESE PROFESSED TERRORIST COMBATANTS?
IS THERE ANY DOUBT THAT THESE ACTIONS, BY THIS ALLEGED PRESIDENT, DEMONSTRATE SYMPATHY FOR THESE ISLAMIC TERRORIST COMBATANTS AND THEIR TERROR CAMPAIGN?
IS THERE ANY DOUBT THAT THESE ARE IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES AND VIOLATIONS OF HIS "OATH OF OFFICE"?

DEMOCRATS KNEECAP AMERICAN PEOPLE.

Anyone notice the Democrat Party has tried kneecapping any big business they can in the United States?
They have successfully shut down the oil companies from functioning within the U.S. borders, they're working on kneecapping the health care industry, they're trying to kneecap other manufacturing with pollution mandates, they're trying to kneecap banking and Wall Street.
This country is being brought to its knees by this political party, and marches onward to a one party dictatorship with increasing fervor.
And you can see how they are ignoring the peoples wishes and complaints. Complain and you are labeled a Nazi, by the very people that are performing like Nazi's in their every action.
Our country and way of life is under serious threat by this Party and its leaders. Examine any functioning dictatorship you know of today, and you will discover many similarities between their people and their government.
"What we have here is a president who views trade policy as nothing more than a tool to advance his own political standing with groups that are hostile to commerce."
Daniel Ikenson, analyst with the Cato Institute

HASAN THE PSYCHIATRIST.

Being awarded a Ph.D. in psychiatry does not declare that you are a sane person or have been cleared as sane in any respect.
As the Ft. Hood tragedy illustrates, the United States education system is in horrible shape. People are being indoctrinated, not educated. And the educators, themselves, are extreme fanatics of some sort, that are teaching their own agenda to an ever increasing number of subjects that will swallow anything to get a passing grade.
There's going to have to be some very tragic circumstances to reverse this trend.
History dictates.

OBAMACARE EQUALS DISASTER!

(click article title for related article).
The main reason Federal Health Care will be a disaster is simply because the Federal Government cannot run anything that resembles a business in a business like manner;
Show one Federal program that has been successfully administered?
…………………………………………………… I didn’t think so.
And people think that these incompetent politicians can run any enterprise?
And obviously, many people are engaged in our demise on a daily basis. Many are openly working on it. How about the terrorist in the White House that apologizes and berates America? And others that illustrate and orate their hate for our Nation?
Nidal Malik Hasan; MMMMMM, MMMMMMMM, MMMMMMMM!

THE TRUTH ABOUT FT. HOOD.

Was Hasan really out of his mind? Not according to the tenets he believed in and was personifying.
Can muslims think of this as a hate crime? No; To be politically correct in Islam, you must slay the infidel.
This attack was within the teachings of the Qur'an.
Hasan is being hailed as a hero by mullahs, since he had the will to carry out his tenets.
How many more are there like him? Every single muslim has this potential. That's the purpose of their "religion".
Anyone whom has done the research knows that Islam is not a "religion", but a philosophy for a battle plan.

COMMANDER IN CHIEF????

(click article title for full article.)
When you need a complete, up to date example of what an incompetent, arrogant, ignorant, and immature individual looks like, you have to look no further than the current Commander in Chief of the United States of America.
I think that Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan and Barack Hussein Obama (aka Barry Soetero) have many similarities;
They appear to be stable individuals on the surface; But turmoil is boiling up in their heads. This type of person exacts their revenge on what they consider, the "enemy", at some point.
I'm waiting for Obama to start shouting "Allahu Akbar" any day now.
If it walks like a muslim, talks like a muslim, behaves like a muslim, and comes from muslim childhood, is it a christian? Oh, right! We must not offend!